Judicial

Ganz, despite running multiple times and losing, was described in fairly glowing terms by panel members, who generally agreed he would make a fine judge. One lawyer described Ganz as very measured and reasonable. Howell was also described as eminently qualified for the bench. The panel agreed Ganz and Howell were head and shoulders above Kurth and should advance to the general.

The panel believes Goodey is the best candidate. She was described as being exceptional on the civil side. There were some mixed reviews on Thunell, with some saying he was too biased toward the prosecution side, but he is well-liked and capable. Hooge was seen as a distant third by the panel, with his reputation as bar counsel not great among attorneys. The panel said Goodey and Thunell should advance to the general.

The panel was very down on the quality of candidates in this department. They could not come to any recommendation, citing bar complaints. There was some thought that Mary Perry was the lesser of three evils, but the panel decided on no recommendation.

Judge Henderson was described as a good-hearted judge who does a pretty good job on the bench, despite some notable reversals and delays in issuing orders. There were some favorable things said about Petsas, but the consensus was mostly that Henderson deserves re-election.

Forman was described as eminently thoughtful and hard-working with a good temperament. He also has a lot of experience in family court. Forman was the clear recommendation here.

Walker seemed to be given a slight edge here over the other two, and Ray had some mixed reviews. But the panel agreed all three are qualified for the job.

The panel described Walker as exceptionally qualified, with experience on both sides and a great temperament. Murphy also received plaudits as a woman of integrity and fine temperament for the bench. The recommendation is for Walker and Murphy.

Wiersch was seen as an exceptional candidate by the panel. She was described as dedicated, hard-working and compassionate. She was also described as head and shoulders above the other two candidates. The panel recommended Wiersch.

Schifalacqua was described as a tough but fair judge, but panel members were puzzled why she has defied norms and required defendants to be present at their initial appearance when established practice is just for attorneys to be there. The panel also agreed that Hendron was qualified and has balanced experience on the civil and criminal sides. So the recommendation was for Schifalacqua and Hendron.

Panel members believe this race should be between Allmon and Cory. One said Cory has the perfect disposition for the bench. But the clear recommendation was for Cory and Allmon to advance.