The Indy Outlook: Observations on the Nevada Economy and Revenues
by Alan Schlottmann
The positive forecasts for state revenues by the Economic Forum are certainly welcome news for the Legislature. As discussed in the excellent summary article on the revenue forecasts, the additional revenue will come from the broad range of tax instruments in Nevada rather than from a single revenue source that was simply underestimated in the original forecasts.
As the Legislature now contemplates how to utilize these extra funds, it might prove useful to identify some of the underlying characteristics of the Nevada economy that will influence success or failure of new legislative initiatives. There are three items that should be considered.
First, it needs to be recognized that the Nevada economy takes a long time to recover from any negative event such as a recession or major downturn in the business cycle. The Nevada economy tends to pick up from an economic downturn only after most states have begun to grow again and, more importantly, at a slower initial pace. As noted in the underlying data by the Economic Forum:
In Nevada, where economic recovery started later than the other 49 states and was initially considerably slower than what was seen elsewhere in the nation, signs of recovery have become more evident in 2016. Though it took more than two years longer than the nation as a whole to do so, Nevada’s job market finally recovered the 186,400 jobs lost during the Great Recession by September 2016 (page 6 of full Forum report).
Second, Nevada unfortunately remains one of the states with the highest rate of involuntary part-time workers. These are workers who are officially counted as employed but actually are under economic pressure in that they are “working less than 35 hours per week who want to work full time, are available to do so, and gave an economic reason (their hours had been cut back or they were unable to find a full-time job) for working part time.” Thus, while the official unemployment rate for Nevada (second quarter of 2016 through first quarter of 2017 averages) is 5.6 percent the broader measure of labor force underutilization is more than double, 11.9 percent. The importance of involuntary part-time workers in the Nevada economy is shown in the chart below from the US Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS).
Third, and finally, the developing national trend of job losses in retail trade even with a growing national economy might become a problem for Nevada. Because of the nature of our economy, Nevada has a higher percentage of retail jobs (per 1,000 workers) compared to national averages as shown below (BLS data):
State | Employment per thousand jobs | Relative to national
fraction (of 1.00) |
Arizona | 33.9 | 1.05 |
California | 27.6 | 0.86 |
Nevada | 39.0 | 1.21 |
Utah | 31.6 | 0.98 |
Thus, the Legislature should be aware of a potential need for funding flexibility in workforce development initiatives and provisions for health and humans services if the recent retail job losses become an actual longer term trend for Nevada.
This column’s author, Dr. Alan Schlottmann, Ph.D., is a Professor of Economics at UNLV’s Lee Business School.
DISCLAIMER: This editorial does not represent the views of UNLV.
Selected Sources:
Economic Forum: Data and Full Report
Bureau of Labor Statistics
https://www.bls.gov/lau/stalt.htm
https://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes412031.htm