The Nevada Independent

Your state. Your news. Your voice.

The Nevada Independent

Adam Hosmer-Henner

Lawyers debate if taking redistricting out of Legislature's hands will cost more money

Supreme Court justices will weigh arguments about whether proposed ballot measures contain unfunded mandates and issue a decision in the coming months.

Sign up for our newsletters

The Daily Indy
Join more than 20,000 Nevadans who start their day with The Daily Indy, our free flagship daily newsletter that gives you what you need to know in Nevada today.
Indy Elections
This newsletter takes you behind the headlines of Nevada politics, delivering scoops and smart analysis on the races that could reshape our lives.
Indy Environment
Reporter Amy Alonzo peels back the curtain on her environmental beat and curates some of the best land, water and energy journalism in the West in this monthly newsletter.
Indy Gaming
Howard Stutz’s weekly dive into what’s innovative and interesting in Nevada’s gaming, sports and hospitality industries and how it’s shaping the rest of the world.
Indy Education
Reporter Rocio Hernandez takes readers inside Nevada’s K-12 school system, delivering the latest education policy news and exclusive interviews with movers and shakers in this twice-monthly newsletter.

Fate of redistricting commission ballot question may depend on judge's ruling on electronic signatures, deadline extension

Attorneys for Fair Maps Nevada, the group backing the ballot question, argued in federal court on Tuesday that District Court Judge Miranda Du should order Secretary of State Barbara Cegavske's office to offer those alternatives given that the normal playbook for gathering signatures has been thrown out the window given the strict social distancing and stay-at-home orders amid the COVID-19 pandemic.

Photo of the top front of the building with the words Supreme Court of Nevada

Redistricting ballot question heads to Supreme court over 'frivolous' appeals

In the motion, attorneys for the group said that the appeal was not only another attempt to delay signature gathering for the petition, but also an "unmistakable misuse" of the legal process given that the opposing side had already prevailed in district court and required backers to use a different, watered-down "description of effect."