Nevadans will vote on a ballot question to enshrine abortion rights in the state Constitution, though the measure would not affect access to abortion care in the Silver State.
Ethics cases can cover a wide range of campaign activities: from police and fire chiefs using their uniforms to campaign and endorse other candidates, using public employees' staff time toward a re-election bid or using a county law enforcement notification app for political promotions.
Sign up for our newsletters
The Daily Indy
Sunday-Friday
Sign up to get exclusive Nevada news and analysis right in your inbox.
Indy Elections
Every Tuesday
Our reporters take you beyond the sound bites to dig into Nevada politics, delivering scoops and smart analysis on key races and important policy issues.
Indy Environment
Monthly
From hiking trails to town hall meetings, Amy Alonzo breaks news on the environmental beat and curates the best land, water and energy journalism in the West.
Indy Education
Twice monthly
Get schooled as Rocio Hernandez takes you inside Nevada’s K-12 education system, delivering insightful policy news and exclusive interviews with movers and shakers.
Indy Gaming
Every other Wednesday
Veteran reporter Howard Stutz explores what’s innovative and interesting in Nevada’s gaming, sports and hospitality industries and its interplay with global trends.
A Carson City judge had dismissed the case — involving the governor's use of his sheriff's badge and uniform on the 2022 campaign trail — in early January.
Reproductive rights are trying to place a question on the 2024 ballot to enshrine those rights in Nevada's constitution. A Carson City judge ruled the question was too broad, but an appeal is expected in the Nevada Supreme Court
Carson City judge has rejected the language of a proposed ballot referendum petition that would have repealed public funding for a new Major League Baseball (MLB) stadium in Las Vegas.
The state law passed in 2021 stipulates, "a presidential preference primary election must be held for all major political parties on the first Tuesday in February of each presidential election year," unless there is only one or no qualified candidate for that party.
Judge James Russell issued the ruling from the bench Monday, denying the state party's lawsuit filed in May challenging a 2021 law moving the state away from a presidential caucus to a primary election.
More than two weeks after a Carson City judge ruled against former Republican gubernatorial candidate and Reno-area lawyer Joey Gilbert in his bid to undo his primary loss to Clark County Sheriff Joe Lombardo, Gilbert has yet to file a promised appeal of the decision to the state Supreme Court as of Monday afternoon.
Candidates in about a third of state legislative primaries have publicly cast doubt on the election process or expressed their support for the "Big Lie."
The initiative was filed Thursday with the secretary of state's office by College of Southern Nevada professor Sondra Cosgrove, who headed the 2020 effort.
Carson City District Court Judge James Russell said on Thursday that he'll take the request to halt the proposed constitutional amendment under advisement, after attorneys representing the Legislature, secretary of state, mining companies and a handful of small rural counties spent nearly three and a half hours locked in oral arguments.
In a "Facts vs. Myths" document posted to the secretary of state's website late Friday, Cegavske's office wrote that it is pursuing several "isolated" cases of voter fraud, but has not seen evidence of any large-scale fraud that would meaningfully affect Trump's 33,596-vote loss in the state. Electors cast Nevada's six electoral votes for President-elect Joe Biden on Monday.
Election law experts interviewed by The Nevada Independent said the failures were unsurprising. Nevada's legal parameters for challenging election results sets a high bar for acceptable evidence, including clear proof that serious error or malfeasance occurred before a court can step in and take action that could change the outcome of an election.
The three page order states that the Trump campaign failed to identify any direct "unsupported factual findings" in Russell's order that it wished to challenge under the appeal, and the court itself has "identified none."
The appeal notice was filed Monday afternoon before the state's highest court and marks the likely last chance for the president's campaign to challenge election results in Nevada, as Tuesday marks a federal "safe harbor" election deadline where states must certify election results or resolve litigation before members of the Electoral College meet to cast their votes for president by Dec. 14.
Judge James Russell ruled Friday against the Trump campaign's unprecedented request to either block certification of the state's presidential election results or award the state's electoral votes to Trump, saying in a written order that the campaign's claims of voter fraud to the level needed to bring the state's presidential results into question fell far short of the evidentiary standard needed to contest the results of the presidential election.
Public records obtained by The Nevada Independent indicate that more than 2,400 background checks on private party transactions have been conducted between the law's effective date in January and Sept. 1. But the state Department of Public Safety — which manages the state's background check system — only reported four issuances of "red flag" Extreme Risk Protection Orders over the last nine months.
Carson City District Court Judge James Russell issued the ruling from the bench on Monday, saying that state lawmakers had violated the constitutional two-thirds vote requirement for tax increases in passing two bills during the last session that extended tax rates or fees that were set to expire.